Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Reading 90

Dave Pollard poses a series of questions for progressives. Select at least two of the questions to respond to, and post your response as a comment.
  1. Choosing Your Charities: There are a hundred good causes always asking for money, and hundreds of people on the streets asking for change, busking, washing your windshield, selling those 50 cent newspapers etc. How do you choose? Who do you give to, and when? Local or global? Health or social service? People you know raising money for luxuries or organized fundraisers supporting the really desperate? Cash or a good meal?
  2. Local vs Organic/Humane/Fair Trade Foods: It's so hard to find stuff that's both. Between fresh local stuff that could well be tainted with melamine and other toxins, and long-distance, shipped-by-diesel ethical foods that might have no nutrition left, which do you choose?Government-Assisted & Centralized, or Community-Based: On the big-ticket issues where inequality is at critical levels, like education and health, most progressives like the idea of universal, free-for-all programs. But at the same time community-based unschooling programs, and community-run clinics that use volunteers to stretch dollars, have a lot of appeal and they're the antithesis of massive, state-run programs. And what is your position on voucher programs, that basically give people the money (or equivalent) and leave it up to them how to spend it (on food, on their choice of schools etc.)?
  3. City Versus Country: Country is healthier, and better for the soul, but (unless you telecommute and are very self-sufficient) city is more ecologically sustainable, more land-economical. The suburbs are no compromise -- they're the worst of both worlds. So where do you choose to live?
  4. Immigration Policy: At current rates of immigration, the US population will soar to one billion by 2100, and the Canadian population to 100 million. Many people believe we have no right to keep people out just because of where they had the misfortune to be born. But such populations will wipe out our last remaining wilderness, increase pollution proportionally to their numbers, and devastate our forests and farmlands. So do you opt for human kindness or ecological sustainability?
  5. Stopping at Zero: Those who don't care about our environment, or don't know any better, have no compunction about having large families. What should we do about such people? Compensate by having none, or just one, of our own? Make it clear that we find their conduct irresponsible and reprehensible? Even if they're good in other ways, or the loved ones of our loved ones?
  6. Watch or Turn it Off: The news is mostly bad, and mostly unactionable, so there's a tendency to shut it off and not subject yourself to more grief -- you know what's happening, and don't need to be reminded. Or do you? Is there something in that news that is your undiscovered cause, something that you can do something about, something that you really need to know?
  7. Make & DIY, versus Buy: There is much to be said for self-sufficiency, both because it's ecologically sustainable and because it's pleasurable to learn to do things for yourself. But the trade-off is the time it takes you to learn and practice, and the fact that someone else may have this as their only skill, their only way to make a living, and if everyone does it themselves, they're out of a job.
  8. Made in China or Doing Without: There are many things, from clothes to computers, that are almost impossible to buy from local or even domestic suppliers. So the alternative to buying something shoddily (and environmentally irresponsibly) made by slave labour in China for some giant multinational corporation, overpackaged and shipped thousands of miles, that will end up in the landfill in six months, is not to buy that item at all (unless you have the time and skill to make it yourself -- see #8 above). What are we willing to live without?
  9. Choosing How to Spend Your Time: This is probably the toughest dilemma of all. So much needs to bedone. But we need to focus on where we can make a real difference, and on causes that we not only care about, but enjoy working on. Life is too short to do work you don't love. And you need time for yourself and those you love, too.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think that we as Americans should stickly try to but American made objects that way for one we support our country and we know that it is made so much better. When China makes things they do not put much craftmanship in it and the Americans do. I my-self am willing to live without alot of things just to know I am supporting the U.S..

Anonymous said...

I realize that the news has alot of negative things on it, but it also has some valuable things on it also. The news informs us of everything going on around us and alot of this gives us information that we as people need to know. If it was not for the news we would not know about the weather,whats going around,about presidentcy,and many more. The news also alerts us about the economy (I know it is depressing) and we needs need to be meet. Just because the news has alot of negative things on it does not mean that the people need to ignore it.

travisp said...

on the city versus country i choose to live in the country i was born and raised in the country. personally i like it because there is simply less hustle and bustle and everyone knows every one in the country.
by travis

Anonymous said...

City or Country? Honestly I would prefer the country due to past experience in the rural and suburban area. The country is alot more efficient in several ways. One its alot more calm n safer there, whereas the city moves in a much more faster pase with enormously alot more people there. The country has lesser people there and is more quiet, and you can be more independent and alone.

Unknown said...

I would give to hospitals and third world countries. But i would also give around my community too, because you don't have to go to Africa or somewhere like that to find struggling people.

Anonymous said...

Human kindness and ecological sustainability are two important factors to focus on. Who says foreigners have to stay in a certain country and not immigrate to another. This is a free country and rights has been solved. On the other hand, U.S population increasing to 100 million is outrageous. I beleive that at some point the government will have no other choice and pass a law on immigration. Only to avoid any altercations dealing with our forests and mainly pollution propotionally.

Anonymous said...

Misty,
I agree that we should support ourselves but thinking about all the places we get our products from we are really spoiled by that. I think if we took more time to produce the products that we could better ourselves and have the quality would be a little more.

tonya

Anonymous said...

in response to question 8...there are things that are made in the us you just have to look and might even have to spend a little more money but it will keep everyones job here in america and not send it over seas. in response to question 9 time is what you make it. you can sleep read and do many other things. you do what you want with what you have. trust God in all that you do. and never lose sight of what you want. Tiffany P

Unknown said...

Toyna,

I agree 100% on what you are saying. I believe if people had to really work for what they had the world would not be the way it is today. I have been to Africa on a mission trip and I have seen it first hand what they live like over there and I am not going to lie, I couldn't do it. But their spirits are so high and they love the Lord and just keep on, when we would probably just give up and die.

Brandy

Anonymous said...

I also think that people should work for or work harder for what they have thats why people today are so spoiled.

Pooh Dunbar

Anonymous said...

I would much more rather live in the city than in the country! I think the city best fits who I am as a person in many ways than one. By living in the city there is so much more to do and so many different people to meet!

-Keshia

Anonymous said...

Choosing for charities i would never just give someone on the street money because you really dont know what they are doing with it i would to let someone barrow money and then they go spend it on drugs or somthing not useful because alot of people are like that and i knew one person that woul stand out acting like she was poor for money and she really was not, now if it was for a real charity then i would be more than happy to help unfortunate people bc it is proven they need help.

-Alysha

Anonymous said...

i like living in the country but i love the city also because there is so much more opportunity and things to do im sure it is harder to get around but that is just somehting you get used to, i would perfer to live at the beach to be honest.

-alysha

Anonymous said...

Should you watch it or turn it off? I watch the news because there are things that are going on around us that we might need to know.Yes, some of the news can be sad, but if you don't know what is going on how are you going to know how you can help. Alison

Anonymous said...

City or Country? I like the country because I have lived in the country all my life. The country has more advantages over the city because you can be more independent for yourself. There are some things that are probably cheaper here than it is in the city, so I prefer the country myself. Alison

Anonymous said...

I think that we need to watch the news because even though there are things that we would much rather not see, we still need to know what is going on in the world today even if we think we might already know everything that is happening. We will continue to learn new and interesting facts about what is going on around us!

-Keshia

Anonymous said...

I like the country because i grew up in the country. The city wouldn't fit me because i don't like people who think they are better than you are and you find a lot of that in the city. Benjamin I.